> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://gang-gems.gitbook.io/qtv/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://gang-gems.gitbook.io/qtv/modelling-2-ontologies-portrayal-and-perspectivisation-level-iii.md).

# Modelling 2 Ontologies: Portrayal & Perspectivisation – Level III

In this phase, the team examined Gangemi and Presutti's work[ Formal Representation and Extraction of Perspectives](https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/creating-a-more-transparent-internet/formal-representation-and-extraction-of-perspectives-aldo-gangemi-and-valentina-presutti/68031FA35DEDC64DE2790F4E8EEEC7FB). &#x20;

To fully capture the complexity of LGBTQ+ representation, we designed our system using two interconnected ontologies:

1. [LGBTQPortrayal.ttl](https://github.com/Gang-Gems/QTV/blob/main/LGBTQPortrayal.ttl) **Ontology**\
   Focuses on *how* queer characters are represented on screen.
2. [Perspectivisation](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Tossing-Cookies/KRKE-gp24/main/ODP/persp.ttl) **Ontology** (based on Gangemi & Presutti)\
   Focuses on *why* and *from which perspective* a certain portrayal exists.

This refinement enhanced the ontology's ability to comprehensively represent and analyze the **diverse perspectives** of the **portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters** in teenage tv series dramas, examining recurring tropes, stereotypes, and narrative roles.  By integrating the **Perspectivisation Ontology** (Gangemi & Presutti), it allows for the exploration of different perspectives on LGBTQ+ representation through two primary lenses: Profit-Driven (market-oriented portrayals) and Social Impact (authentic and empowering narratives). This approach enables a deeper understanding of how industry motivations, audience reception, and cultural factors shape LGBTQ+ visibility in media.

***

### 📷 Ontology Visualization

<figure><img src="/files/eOBuh5wWuSYPIWM8vE9G" alt=""><figcaption><p>Merged Visualization (📁 <a href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Gang-Gems/QTV/main/visualization/merged%20ontology.xmind">download the xmind file</a>)</p></figcaption></figure>

***

### OWL Ontology in RDF/Turtle <a href="#owl-ontology-in-rdf-turtle" id="owl-ontology-in-rdf-turtle"></a>

[LGBTQPortrayal ](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Gang-Gems/QTV/main/LGBTQPortrayal.ttl)Ontology&#x20;

### 🔍 Core classes of Ontology Perspective (Adapted from Perspectivisation Ontology)

This is a list of the <mark style="color:orange;">classes</mark> and relative <mark style="color:yellow;">sublasses</mark>.

<mark style="color:orange;">`Eventuality`</mark> \
Represents the central phenomenon or narrative fact under analysis — in this case, the portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters in teenage television dramas. In line with Perspectivisation Ontology, it anchors the perspective process.

* <mark style="color:yellow;">`PortrayalOfLGBTQCharacters`</mark>

  The concrete representation of queer identities within the narrative framework. It’s the core “event” that will be viewed through various lenses and influenced by contextual and attitudinal factors.

<mark style="color:orange;">`Lens`</mark>\
The interpretative angle or ideological frame applied to the portrayal. A lens orients how an Eventuality is perceived, evaluated, and discussed.

* <mark style="color:yellow;">`ProfitDrivenLens`</mark>

  A perspective that emphasizes marketability, audience reach, and economic interests. It tends to favor representations that are safe, simplified, or stereotypical if they enhance profitability.
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`SocialImpactLens`</mark>

  A socially conscious perspective aiming for accurate, affirming, and inclusive portrayals. It focuses on the effect of representation on public understanding and LGBTQ+ self-perception.

<mark style="color:orange;">`Attitude`</mark>\
Represents the evaluative stance taken within a given lens. In Perspectivisation Ontology, attitudes specify how the lens interprets or values the Eventuality.

* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Profit-Driven`</mark>
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`MarketFriendly:`</mark>A neutral-to-positive framing aimed at pleasing wide audiences without controversy. Often includes vague or sanitized depictions.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`Tokenization:`</mark>Represents the inclusion of queer characters in superficial ways — to appear diverse without offering narrative depth.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`Queerbaiting:`</mark>Describes intentional suggestions of queerness without commitment — used to attract queer audiences while avoiding alienating others.
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Social Impact`</mark>

  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`EmpowermentRepresentation:`</mark>Highlights characters who are confident, visible, and central to the story — challenging marginalization and invisibility.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`ChallengingStereotypes:`</mark>Seeks to subvert harmful tropes and propose alternative ways of portraying LGBTQ+ identities.

<mark style="color:orange;">`Background`</mark>\
The socio-cultural, industrial, and historical context that shapes how representations are created and interpreted. In Perspectivisation Ontology, background frames the lens and attitude with real-world influence.

* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Profit`</mark>
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`StreamingPolicies:`</mark>Guidelines set by streaming platforms that affect what kinds of representation are permissible or encouraged.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`CensorshipLaws:`</mark> National or regional laws that suppress or regulate LGBTQ+ content.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`FinancialRisk:`</mark>Economic considerations that may discourage complex or controversial queer narratives.<br>
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Social Impact`</mark>

  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`QueerTheory:`</mark> Academic and activist thought informing more nuanced and deconstructed views of identity and representation.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`AudienceDemand:`</mark> The influence of public calls for more inclusive and authentic portrayals, especially from LGBTQ+ youth.
  * <mark style="color:yellow;">`HistoricalTrends:`</mark> Past patterns of representation (e.g., tragic tropes, invisibility) that shape both audience expectation and creator intention.

<mark style="color:orange;">`Cut`</mark>\
A "cut" represents the reinterpretation of an LGBTQ+ portrayal shaped by the interaction of Lens, Attitude, and Background. The “cut” is how representation manifests in the final product — it's the output of perspectivisation.

* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Character Type`</mark>\
  It is the resulting narrative role or figure. It synthesizes the effect of all previous layers into a recognizable portrayal archetype. Each character can be linked to stereotypes, narrative functions such as leading or supporting roles, story arcs showing positive or negative development, and queerbaiting patterns.
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Token Character`</mark>\
  LGBTQ+ character is included, but lacks depth, meaningful development, or plot influence.
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Comic Sidekick`</mark>\
  LGBTQ+ character is a secondary figure, often used for humor. The role played is a supporting / comic role and it does not dramatise his ambiguity.
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Authentic Representation`</mark>\
  &#x20;LGBTQ+ character is portrayed with realism and depth. This character actively promotes authentic LGBTQ+ representation to challenge stereotypes.
* <mark style="color:yellow;">`Queer Protagonist Leed Role`</mark>\
  LGBTQ+ character drives the story and challenges norms. The role played is central, usually drama, in which the character researches itself.

***

### 🔗 Object Properties Between Ontologies

| Property               | Domain → Range                        | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| ---------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `viewedThroughLens`    | PortrayalOfLGBTQCharacters → Lens     | Connects the portrayal of an LGBTQ+ character to the interpretative lens applied to it. This property expresses the perspectival framing through which the representation is analyzed — whether driven by commercial goals or social responsibility. |
| `hasAttitude`          | Lens → Attitude                       | Links a lens to the evaluative stance it adopts. This captures the nuance within each perspective — such as whether a commercial lens promotes tokenism or market-friendliness, or whether a social lens fosters empowerment or authenticity.        |
| `affectsPortrayal`     | Attitude → PortrayalOfLGBTQCharacters | Indicates how a particular attitude influences the way LGBTQ+ characters are represented. It allows tracing specific outcomes (e.g., queerbaiting or challenging stereotypes) back to their ideological stance.                                      |
| `providesContextFor`   | Background → Attitude                 | Denotes how cultural, historical, industrial, or academic background conditions shape or support the emergence of a specific attitude. It embeds the attitude in its real-world context.                                                             |
| `emergesFrom`          | Cut → Eventuality                     | Specifies that the final portrayal (Cut) arises from the original representational phenomenon. It connects the output of the perspectivisation process to the core event under analysis.                                                             |
| `shapedByLens`         | Cut → Lens                            | Captures the influence of the chosen lens on the final portrayal. This property reveals how interpretative frameworks (profit-driven or socially conscious) mold the representation into specific character types or outcomes.                       |
| `shapedByAttitude`     | Cut → Attitude                        | Relates the final form of representation to the evaluative attitude that directed it. It helps explain how the stance taken — such as queerbaiting or empowerment — manifests in the narrative result.                                               |
| `informedByBackground` | Cut → Background                      | Highlights how broader cultural or industrial contexts influence the form a portrayal ultimately takes. This property situates the final narrative outcome within the real-world forces that shaped it.                                              |

***

### 🧩 Punned Entities in Ontology Modeling

In our ontology, we adopted **punning** as a modeling strategy to support both **conceptual clarity** and **practical annotation**. This technique, drawn from OWL 2 practices, allows the same term to be used both as a **class** (a conceptual category) and as an **individual** (an instance used in data).

Punning enables a single term (URI) to play two roles:

* As a **class**, it defines a conceptual category in the ontology (e.g., `TokenCharacter` as a subclass of `CharacterType`).
* As an **individual**, it serves as a tag or value when annotating real-world data (e.g., a specific character being a `TokenCharacter`).

By applying punned entities in our ontology, we achieved:

* **Conceptual Reusability**\
  Categories like `FairRepresentation`, `ComicSidekick`, or `PositiveRoleModel` are defined once in the ontology and reused across portrayals, characters, and impact annotations.
* **Theoretical Alignment**\
  Media and cultural studies often treat tropes and roles both as **abstract patterns** and as **recurring instantiations**. Our use of punning mirrors this interpretive flexibility.

This approach also supports our perspectivist methodology, this approach allows multiple overlapping "lenses" of analysis without enforcing rigid hierarchical boundaries.

***

#### 🧱 Punned Entity Table

| **Entity**                                | **As Class Of**                    | **Also Instance Of**    |
| ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------- |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:FairRepresentation`       | subclass of `RepresentationType`   | type of `rep_type_uri`  |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:UnfairRepresentation`     | subclass of `RepresentationType`   | type of `rep_type_uri`  |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:Detailed`                 | subclass of `CharacterDepth`       | type of `portrayal_uri` |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:Superficial`              | subclass of `CharacterDepth`       | type of `portrayal_uri` |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:AuthenticRepresentation`  | subclass of `CharacterType`        | type of `character_uri` |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:ComicSidekick`            | subclass of `CharacterType`        | type of `character_uri` |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:TokenCharacter`           | subclass of `CharacterType`        | type of `character_uri` |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:QueerProtagonistLeadRole` | subclass of `CharacterType`        | type of `character_uri` |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:PositiveRoleModel`        | subclass of `LGBTQCommunityImpact` | type of `impact_uri`    |
| `LGBTQPortrayal:NegativeRoleModel`        | subclass of `LGBTQCommunityImpact` | type of `impact_uri`    |

***

### 🎯 Example Mapping: *Riverdale’s Kevin Keller*

| Element                              | Value                                      |
| ------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------ |
| Portrayal                            | Static, Superficial                        |
| RepresentationType                   | Unfair                                     |
| Lens                                 | ProfitDrivenLens                           |
| Attitude                             | Tokenization                               |
| Background                           | Streaming Policies, Market Appeal          |
| Cut                                  | Token Character                            |
| LGBTQ Community Impact               | Negative                                   |
| LGBTQ Community Impact Justification | Reinforces clichés, lacks narrative agency |

***

###
